Josh Hawley says he had 'good chat' with Trump after dustup over stock trading billNew Foto - Josh Hawley says he had 'good chat' with Trump after dustup over stock trading bill

WASHINGTON (AP) —Sen. Josh Hawleyis brushing offPresident Donald Trump'squip that he's a "second-tier" senator after the Republican's proposal toban stock tradingby members of Congress — and the president and vice president — won bipartisan approval to advance in a committee vote. The Missouri Republican told Fox News late Wednesday that it's "not the worst thing" he's ever been called and that he and the president "had a good chat" clearing up confusion over the bill. The misunderstanding, Hawley said, was thatDonald Trumpwould have to sell his Mar-a-Lago private club and other assets. "Not the case at all," Hawley said on "Jesse Watters Primetime." It was thesecond timein many days that Trump laid into senators in his own party as the president tries, sometimes without success, to publicly pressure them to fall in line. Earlier, Trump tore into veteranGOP Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowaover an obscure Senate procedure regarding nominations. In a social media post, Trump called Hawley a "second-tier Senator" who was playing into the hands of Democrats. Trump added: "I don't think real Republicans want to see their President, who has had unprecedented success, TARGETED, because of the 'whims' of a second-tier Senator named Josh Hawley!" Stock trading bans gain support Stock trading by members of Congress haslong been an issuethat both parties have tried to tackle, especially as some elected officials have become wealthy while in elected office. During the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular, it was disclosed that lawmakers were trading as information about the health crisis before it became public. Insider trading laws don't always apply to the types of information lawmakers receive. Hawley's legislation with the panel's top Democrat, Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan, sailed out of the Senate's Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, after his support delivered a bipartisan vote over the objections of the other Republicans, who have majority control. GOP senators had been working with the White House on the stock trade bill, and some supported a broad carve-out to exclude the president from the ban, but it failed, with Hawley joining Democrats to block it. Trump also complained that Hawley joined with Democrats to block another amendment that would have investigated the stock trades ofDemocratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the speaker emerita, and her spouse. Paul Pelosi has been a much-watched trader, but the California lawmaker's office said she personally does not own stock. Hawley said after his conversation with Trump that the president "reiterated to me he wants to see a ban on stock trading by people like Nancy Pelosi and members of Congress, which is what we passed." The senator also suggested the Democratic leader should be prosecuted, but it's not clear on what grounds. Pelosi supports Hawley's bill Pelosi has said repeatedly that she's not involved in her husband's work on investments, strongly supports the bill and looks forward to voting for it in the House. "The American people deserve confidence that their elected leaders are serving the public interest — not their personal portfolios," she said. In a joint statement, Hawley and Peters said the legislation, called the Honest Act, builds on an earlier bill and would ban members of Congress, the president, vice president and their spouses from holding, buying or selling stock. An earlier proposal from Hawley, named after Pelosi, had focused more narrowly on lawmakers. If the bill were to become law, it would immediately prohibit elected officials, including the president, from buying stocks and would ban them from selling stocks for 90 days after enactment. It also requires the elected officials to divest from all covered investments, but not until the beginning of their next term in office — shielding the term-limited president from that requirement. "We have an opportunity here today to do something that the public has wanted to do for decades," Hawley told the panel. "And that is to ban members of Congress from profiting on information that frankly only members of Congress have on the buying and selling of stock." During the committee hearing, tensions flared as Republicans sought other approaches. Republicans fail to exempt Trump from stock trading ban GOP Sen. Rick Scott of Florida proposed one amendment that would exempt the president, the vice president, their spouses and dependent children from the legislation, and the other one that would have required a report on the Pelosi family's trades. Both were defeated, with Hawley joining the Democrats. "We are one step closer to getting this bill passed into law and finally barring bad actors from taking advantage of their positions for their own financial gain," Peters said in a statement. One Republican, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, said the overall bill is "legislative demagoguery." "We do have insider trading laws. We have financial disclosure. Trust me, we have financial disclosure," Johnson said. "So I don't see the necessity of this." GOP's Grassley 'offended' by Trump's personal attack Trump's post criticizing Hawley comes after a similar blowback directed Tuesday night at Grassley. In that post, Trump pressured Grassley to do away with the Senate's longtime "blue slip" custom that often forces bipartisan support on presidential nominations of federal judges. The practice requires both senators in a state to agree to push a nominee forward for a vote. Trump told Grassley to do away with the practice. "Senator Grassley must step up," Trump said, while claiming that he helped the senator, who was first elected in 1980, to win reelection. Grassley earlier Wednesday said he was "offended" by what the president said.

Josh Hawley says he had 'good chat' with Trump after dustup over stock trading bill

Josh Hawley says he had 'good chat' with Trump after dustup over stock trading bill WASHINGTON (AP) —Sen. Josh Hawleyis brushing off...
Exclusive-Trump officials told Congress Israel agreed to match $30 million for GHF, sources sayNew Foto - Exclusive-Trump officials told Congress Israel agreed to match $30 million for GHF, sources say

By Jonathan Landay, Humeyra Pamuk and Daphne Psaledakis WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Senior Trump administration officials told Congress this month that Israel agreed to match a U.S. award of $30 million to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, a previously unreported contribution to the controversial armed private aid operation. Aside from the U.S. contribution, which the U.S. State Department announced in June, the sources of the foundation's funding have been opaque - GHF does not disclose its donors. Israel faces intensifying international pressure over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and its promotion of GHF's aid operation, which has distribution sites only in southern Gaza and has been called dangerous and ineffective by aid groups and the United Nations - claims the group denies. Aryeh Lightstone and Charles Leith, aides to Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, briefed U.S. Senate and House of Representatives committees on July 8 and 9 about the GHF operation, according to the two sources. They told the congressional committees that Israel had agreed to match the $30 million that the U.S. awarded to GHF in June, enough to fund the organization through the end of July, according to the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Lightstone and Leith did not respond to a request for an interview and the White House referred questions to the State Department. Donors "have pledged or disbursed tens of millions of dollars to GHF," a State Department spokesperson said, without identifying those donors. "The United States has pledged tens of millions of dollars," the spokesperson continued, adding that the U.S. aid "does not come close to encompassing the total amount of help the administration has given the people of Gaza since January 2025." The Israeli government did not respond to requests for comment. President Donald Trump said on Monday that the U.S. had dispensed $60 million for Gaza humanitarian aid. The State Department, however, has made no other announcements beyond the $30 million approved for the GHF in June. A third source familiar with the matter said some U.S. officials believe Trump likely was conflating the U.S. and Israeli funds. Lightstone and Leith told Congress the hope was that by August, other donors would see GHF's success and contribute to its operation, allowing the foundation to double its distribution sites from four to eight, according to the sources. Reuters could not verify whether Israel had disbursed the $30 million to GHF, which uses private for-profit U.S. military and logistics firms to transport aid into the Palestinian enclave for distribution to its sites. Speaking on Wednesday to the Hudson Institute think tank, GHF Executive Chairman Rev. Dr. Johnnie Moore, a former evangelical adviser to the White House during Trump's first term, said that as a private U.S. charity, the foundation did not have to disclose its donors. He indicated that GHF required more money. "The biggest problem is just we need more of it, and $30 million is not going to get it done," he said, in an apparent reference to the U.S. contribution. GHF said in an email to Reuters that it was focused on distributing as much food as was safely possible and was continuing to press the Israeli government to allow it to open additional distribution sites, including in northern Gaza. It declined to comment on its donors or funding. STARVATION IN GAZA GHF has been criticized by the United Nations, aid groups and others over what they say is an unsafe aid distribution model and a breach of humanitarian impartiality standards, allegations that GHF denies. Israel alleges that the U.N.-led aid system that has traditionally served the residents of Gaza has let Hamas-led militants loot aid shipments intended for civilians. Hamas denies the accusation. A recent U.S. government internal analysis found no evidence of systematic theft of U.S.-funded aid by Hamas. Starvation has been spreading in Gaza, and a hunger monitor on Tuesday said a worst-case scenario of famine is unfolding and immediate action is needed to avoid widespread death. In his Wednesday remarks, Moore denied that famine is developing. "That's made up. There's not a famine. There's acute hunger. There's not enough food in the Gaza Strip," he said. Gaza health authorities have been reporting increasing deaths from hunger-related causes and images of emaciated Palestinian children have drawn international condemnation. Trump this week declared that many people were starving, contradicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has said there was no starvation in the densely populated coastal enclave, largely destroyed by Israel's military offensive that has killed over 60,000 people according to Gaza health officials. Trump promised to set up new food centers and said the top priority in Gaza was feeding people. Gaza's food stocks have been running out since Israel, at war with Palestinian militant group Hamas since its fighters killed 1,200 people and took 251 hostages back to Gaza in October 2023 according to Israeli tallies, cut off all supplies to the territory in March. That blockade was lifted in May but with restrictions that Israel says are needed to prevent aid being diverted to militant groups. Israel says it has no aim to starve Gaza. This week it announced steps to allow more aid in, including pausing fighting in some locations, air-dropping food and offering more secure routes. (Reporting by Jonathan Landay, Humeyra Pamuk and Daphne Psaledakis in Washington; Additional reporting by Michelle Nichols in New York and Charlotte Greenfield in Jerusalem; Editing by Don Durfee and Deepa Babington)

Exclusive-Trump officials told Congress Israel agreed to match $30 million for GHF, sources say

Exclusive-Trump officials told Congress Israel agreed to match $30 million for GHF, sources say By Jonathan Landay, Humeyra Pamuk and Daphne...
Kamala Harris' decision kickstarts the 2028 Democratic presidential primary: 5 takeawaysNew Foto - Kamala Harris' decision kickstarts the 2028 Democratic presidential primary: 5 takeaways

She's out, but is she really still in? Kamala Harrisended months of speculationabout running for California governor on July 30 when she announced she wasn't vying for the top spot in her home state. "For now," she said, her leadership and public service won't be in elected halls of power. Only Harris knows how long that will be,but her decision leaves the door open for mounting a third White House bid in 2028 amid what's expected to bea jam-packed Democratic fieldbut where the former 60-year-old vice president's diehard supporters appear ready to leap at as President Donald Trump'sapproval numbers dip. "I remain proud AF to have voted for Kamala Harris," Ricky Davila, a Los Angeles-based musician, said ina July 30 post on X, responding to her decision. "It'll always break my heart that we were robbed (of) the opportunity to have a fantastic once in a lifetime president." But the choice comes at a time whenDemocrats are trying to turn the page, particularly in terms of festering questions surrounding former PresidentJoe Biden'sunprecedented exit from last year's race. Here are five takeaways on Harris' blockbuster decision, and what it could mean for Democrats going forward. Several 2028 hopefuls on the Democratic side have already begun to put their stakes in the ground, whether byvisiting early states,launching podcastsordrawing thousandsat rallies across the country. But Harris forgoing a California governor bid now means that a new round of speculation will begin as to whether she wants a third bite at the apple. That will change the calculus for some would-be contenders, but also left-leaning advocacy groups and importantly voters. Longtime Harris allies were bullish, saying the 60-year-old Democrat's brand remains strong. They were blunt when asked about her future. "She can do anything she wants to do, but she owes us nothing," CNN commentator BakariSellers told USA TODAY. "She's a talent and 2028 could be it. Or 2032. Whatever she decides. She's young." A month before Harris' decision, however, anEmerson College surveywas showing her support in a hypothetical 2028 contest beginning to slip as other names emerge. The mock Democratic primary found 16% supporting former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg, with Harris at 13% followed by current California Gov. Gavin Newsom at 12% and Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez both at 7% respectively. More voters were undecided at 23%, the June poll showed. There's no doubt Harris would be the most formidable contender and popular figure among the base if she returns to the national stage. She has the highest name ID and widest fundraising network by far of the potential candidates currently rumored. But she also carries a decent portion of the baggage from the 2024 campaign, which collapsed afterBiden's poor debate performancethat reminded the nation about his age and acuity. Harris' return risks reopening wounds and questions about her role and decision-making during the Biden administration just as the party looks to heal itself after bypassing on a public autopsy about last year's loss. The former VP said in her July 30 statement that her immediate leadership will be dedicated to "helping elect Democrats across the nation." The first test of that appetite for Harris will come this fall as critical races for governor in New Jersey and Virginia -- two states she won in 2024 -- are gearing up for November. Both Reps. Mikie Sherrill, D-N.J., and Abigail Spanberger, D-Va., the Democratic gubernatorial nominees in their respective states,endorsed Harrisfor president. It will be telling how eager and in what ways they and other Democrats, particularly in battleground states and swing districts, will be for Harris' return to the trail whether it is this year or the upcoming 2026 midterms. "Excited about (Harris) hitting the road and traveling the country to help us flip the House and win back Congress," Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., said in a July 30 post on X. "Let's go!" Harris delivered another revealing piece of news after passing on the California governor's race. She iscoming out with a bookabout her experience entitled "107 Days" - which was the length of her abbreviated campaign. "Since leaving office, I've spent a lot of time reflecting on those days and with candor and reflection, I've written a behind-the-scenes account of that journey," Harris said in a July 31 post on X. "I believe there's value in sharing what I saw, what I learned, and what it will take to move forward." What the world saw on the campaign trail was only part of the story.My new book is a behind-the-scenes look at my experience leading the shortest presidential campaign in modern history.107 Days is out on September 23. I can't wait for you to read it:https://t.co/G4bkeZB4NZpic.twitter.com/taUof0L4hs — Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris)July 31, 2025 How much it will reveal remains to be seen about last year's campaign, chiefly her knowledge about Biden's health and how it all went down when she received the party's nomination. Simon & Schuster, the New York-based publisher behind the book, is advertising it as a "page-turning account" with "surprising and revealing insights" so expect political observers to pour over if it lives up to the hype, but the book gives Harris a chance to go back on the road and keep her profile high. If Harris ends up running for a third time, don't expect other rumored candidates to simply walk away and allow for another coronation. Democrats have been engaged in a big debate about their party's future for much of this year, including sharpcriticisms of their leadership in Congressaround how to effectively challenge Trump. There also is a rising populism on the left, emboldened byZohran Mamdani's win in the New York City Democratic primary in June. Those within the activist left especially are pointing to a shift, especially around issues that Harris ducked during the 2024 campaign such as the ongoing conflict in Gaza. A poll released July 29 by Data for Progress, for instance, found 78% of NYC Democratic voters said Israel is committing genocide in the region, and that more are likely to side with the Palestinians. "The dam has broken," Margaret DeReus, executive director of the Institute for Middle East Understanding, which commissioned the survey, said in a statement. "As the Democratic Party considers its future after November's loss, and as poll after poll shows the party's approval to be at historic lows, Zohran Mamdani's ability to energize new voters with his bold platform for Palestinian rights should be a wake-up call." If Harris does run again, it also would create a bit of an awkward scenario where she would be jockeying against some of the same people her failed campaign vetted to be her running mate, includingMinnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who was on the 2024 ticket but has spoken out about last year's campaign. "We shouldn't have been playing this thing so safe,"Walz told Politicoin March. Now that Harris is out, the California governor's race becomes a massive derby among roughly adozen notable contenderswho have already expressed an intention to join the 2026 primary battle. Among the names areXavier Becerra, a former health secretary under Biden;Antonio Villaraigosa, a former L.A. mayor; current Lt. Gov.Eleni Kounalakis, who has beenendorsed by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi; Riverside County SheriffChad Bianco, an outspoken Trump supporter; and former Rep.Katie Porter, a staunch progressive who previously ran for Senate and who many believe to be in the best position to benefit from Harris' exit. AUniversity of California, Irvine pollreleased July 2 showed Harris at 24% with no other would-be contenders receiving double-digit support. Remember in California, candidates sprint in a primary where the top two finishers, regardless of party affiliation, advance to the general election in a runoff. California, which holds the world's fourth largest economy, is thought of as a safe blue state by most forecasters but it has been at the forefront of Trump's immigration crackdown, which has been marked by violent clashes between law enforcement and left-leaning demonstrators. It also has been in the news around other issues, such as homelessness and wildfires, and the UCI survey found that by a 2-to-1 margin, most Californians think their state is on the wrong track. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Kamala Harris stirs Democrats and the 2028 election pot: 5 takeaways

Kamala Harris' decision kickstarts the 2028 Democratic presidential primary: 5 takeaways

Kamala Harris' decision kickstarts the 2028 Democratic presidential primary: 5 takeaways She's out, but is she really still in? Kama...
Irish court rejects Conor McGregor appeal in sexual assault caseNew Foto - Irish court rejects Conor McGregor appeal in sexual assault case

Mixed martial arts fighterConor McGregoron Thursday lost his attempt to overturn a jury's order that he compensate a woman who accused him of raping her, with Ireland's Court of Appeal rejecting the appeal in its entirety. The plaintiff, Nikita Hand, alleged that McGregor sexually assaulted her on December 9, 2018.A jury last year ordered McGregorto pay her nearly 250,000 euros ($285,250) in damages. McGregor, 36, denied the allegation and said he had "fully consensual sex" with Hand. He also denied causing bruising to the plaintiff. In the appeal heard earlier this month, lawyers for McGregor said the judge erred in directing the jury to decide whether he "assaulted" rather than "sexually assaulted" the victim. Judge Brian O'Moore said on Thursday that the appeal court had no doubt the overall effect of the trial judge's charge was to tell them the central allegation by Hand against McGregor was that he had raped her. McGregor's legal team had also argued that the judge should not have allowed a line of questioning during cross-examination regarding McGregor's "no comment" responses in a police interview. That ground was also rejected. Hand embraced a number of people beside her after the appeal court ruling. "To every survivor out there, I know how hard it is, but please don't be silenced. … You deserve to be heard, you also deserve justice. Today, I can finally move on and try to heal," Hand said in a statement outside the court. Hand told the high court in November that she and a friend made contact with McGregor, whom she knew, after a work Christmas party. She said they were driven by McGregor to a party in a penthouse room of a Dublin hotel where drugs and alcohol were consumed. She saidMcGregor, who was not in court on Thursday, took her to a bedroom in the penthouse and sexually assaulted her. Hand's lawyer told the jury that when she was referred to a sexual assault treatment unit the day after the alleged assault, a doctor was so concerned that he directed that photographs be taken of her injuries. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Irish court rejects Conor McGregor appeal in sexual assault case

Irish court rejects Conor McGregor appeal in sexual assault case Mixed martial arts fighterConor McGregoron Thursday lost his attempt to ove...
Tom Brady responds to Scottie Scheffler's comments about choosing family over sportsNew Foto - Tom Brady responds to Scottie Scheffler's comments about choosing family over sports

Scottie Scheffler and Tom Brady are not in the same season of life, but the two athletic titans have clashing opinions on how they view the balancing act ofparentingand professional sports. Earlier this month,world No. 1 golferScottie Scheffler made very clear where his priorities lie -- first as a family man for his wife and son, second as a professional golfer -- just days before winning his fourth major championship of his PGA career. Why Scottie Scheffler says winning at golf is 'not a fulfilling life' ahead of British Open In a July 15 press conference before the tournament began at Royal Portrush Golf Club, Scheffler delivered a deeply honest speech on success, sharing his poignant perspective that underscored the duality of motivation and fulfillment that he said is "something I wrestle with on a daily basis." "At the end of the day it's like -- this is not a fulfilling life," Scheffler said at the time, referring to winning at golf. "And all of a sudden you get to No. 1 in the world, and you're like, 'What's the point? Why do I want to win this tournament so bad?' Because if I win -- it's going to be awesome for about two minutes." In May, at just 29 years old, Scheffler, a two-time Masters champ in 2022 and 2024, won the 2025 PGA Championship at Quail Hollow Golf & Country Club. After his July 15 press conference, he also secured his first Open Championship title at Royal Portrush in Northern Ireland. Scheffler now only needs a U.S. Open win to complete thePGA career grand slam. Speaking to that success, he told reporters, "If my golf ever started affecting my home life or it ever affected the relationship I have with my wife or with my son, that's gonna be the last day that I play out here for a living. This is not the be-all, end-all. This is not the most important thing in my life. And that's why I wrestle with, 'Why is this so important to me?' Because I would much rather be a great father than I would be a great golfer." Brady, regarded as one of the greatest athletes of all time with seven Super Bowl titles and countless stats in the football record books, had a few thoughts about Scheffler's comments, which he expanded on in hisweekly newsletter, 199, on Tuesday. Gisele Bundchen opens up about Tom Brady divorce, co-parenting and more "Scottie said he'd rather be a better father and husband than a good golfer. And my question is: why are those mutually exclusive?" Brady wrote in his newsletter. "Sure, they're different blocks on the pyramid, but they're part of the same pyramid. They're connected! For instance, I think part of being a great father is being a great example of doing what it takes to take care of your family. I chose to do it by playing football." He then argued that giving his all to his job was synonymous with being a great dad and family man. "The hours of practice, the moments when I was laser focused -- those were times when I believe I was doing the best possible thing for my family and my kids, by prioritizing my profession and teaching, by example, what it takes to be really good at your job," he wrote. Brady and his ex-wife, supermodel Giselle Bündchen, were married for 13 years and share two children. Brady also shares a son with actress and model Bridget Moynahan. Both Brady and Bündchen spoke candidly during their marriage about the impact his career had on the family dynamic. In a 2021 episode of his podcast, "Let's Go," Brady, then the quarterback for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, said, "My wife has held down the house for a long time now, and I think there's things that she wants to accomplish. You know, she hasn't worked as much in the last 10, 12 years, just raising our family and kind of committing to being in a life in Boston and then moving to Florida." In 2022, Bündchen told British Vogue that Brady's "focus is on his career, mine is mostly on the kids. And I'm very grateful that he lets me take the reins when it comes to our family." In February 2022, after two seasons with the Buccaneers, Brady announced hisretirementfrom the NFL, then 40 days later flipped the script andunretiredto return for his 23rd season in the league. At the time, Brady missed 11 days of training camp as the team gave him an excused absence to attend to personal matters. In October 2022, during what was Brady's final NFL season, Brady and Bündchen announced theirdivorce. Sports psychologist Dr. Leah Lagos told "Good Morning America" that "there's no one size fits all where every athlete has to prioritize their family over sport, or every athlete has to prioritize their sport over their family." "But knowing which kind of prioritizations and your preferences and just being very authentic about those and harnessing those with truth becomes very powerful," she added. "GMA" co-anchor and Pro Football Hall of Famer Michael Strahan, who played for the New York Giants for 15 years, also weighed in on Brady's and Scheffler's comments, as well as the balancing act that comes with being a professional athlete. "I don't know why it's an argument. Different things work for different people," he said Thursday. "I honestly think the sports are different. Golf, you go for a week and a lot of time they take their family. Football, you're in and out." "I think they're both at different stages of parenting as well. I do think, regardless of how great you are at your job, you are an example to your kids. I see both arguments. Neither is wrong. Both are great," Strahan added.

Tom Brady responds to Scottie Scheffler's comments about choosing family over sports

Tom Brady responds to Scottie Scheffler's comments about choosing family over sports Scottie Scheffler and Tom Brady are not in the same...

 

ALEX JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com