'Extreme Buffoonery And A Mean Spirit': Scott Jennings Singles Out 'Toxic Brew' Of Likely 2028 Dem ContenderNew Foto - 'Extreme Buffoonery And A Mean Spirit': Scott Jennings Singles Out 'Toxic Brew' Of Likely 2028 Dem Contender

Republican strategist Scott Jennings said during a panel discussion on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday that one potential 2028 Democratic candidate would not be the party's future. Democratic Govs. Tim Walz of Minnesota and Wes Moore of Maryland spoke Friday at an event hosted by Democratic South Carolina Rep. James Clyburn,accordingto the New York Times. Jennings, speaking on CNN, expressed doubt about the chances of Walz, who was the Democratic nominee for Vice President in 2024, to lead the party.(RELATED: 'A Boss Move': Scott Jennings Says Trump Confronting South African President Over White Farmers 'Had To Happen') "The other person who spoke in South Carolina, Tim Walz, is a special mixture of extreme buffoonery and a mean spirit, which is a toxic brew," Jennings said. "He is not the future of the Democratic Party." WATCH: "I'll defend the Democrats. They are for things," the strategist added. "Illegal aliens, you're for boys in girls sports. I mean, you are for things and that's why you have such struggles right now in your party, because you're not for anything that's on the right side of any of the 8020 issues that are driving this cultural divide in America." Jennings also said that he thinks Moore "is actually a pretty talented communicator." "Moore is interesting. Moore is interesting," Jennings continued. "Probably more interesting than some of the radicals you have out there. [Democratic Rep. Jasmine] Crockett [of Texas], AOC [Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York], I mean, these are the true leaders of your party right now, but it might be better off replacing them." During his speech at the Clyburn fish fry Friday, Walzcalledon Democrats to "bully the shit" out of President Donald Trump and that Democrats needed to be "a little meaner." "Maybe it's time for us to be a little meaner. Maybe it's time for us to be a little more fierce, because we have to ferociously push back on this," Walz said. "And again, I'll speak to my teacher colleagues in here. The thing that bothers a teacher more than anything is to watch a bully, to watch this bully and to stop it. And when it's a child, you talk to them and you tell them why bullying is wrong. But when it's [an] adult like Donald Trump, you bully the shit out of him." WATCH: Walz previouslyjokedhe was tracking Tesla stock and that its decline gave him "a little boost" during an event in March. Walz was also widelycreditedwith starting the trend of labeling then-Republican Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, Trump's running mate in the 2024 election and now his Vice President, as "weird" during a July 23appearanceon "Morning Joe," according tomultiplereports. All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter's byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contactlicensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

‘Extreme Buffoonery And A Mean Spirit’: Scott Jennings Singles Out ‘Toxic Brew’ Of Likely 2028 Dem Contender

'Extreme Buffoonery And A Mean Spirit': Scott Jennings Singles Out 'Toxic Brew' Of Likely 2028 Dem Contender Republican stra...
Trump's foreign policy frustrations are piling upNew Foto - Trump's foreign policy frustrations are piling up

Every president thinks they can change the world – and Donald Trump has an even greater sense of personal omnipotence than his recent predecessors. But it's not working out too well for the 47th president. Trump might intimidate tech titans to toe the line and use government power to try to bend institutions like Harvard University and judges, but some world leaders are harder to bully. He keeps being ignored and humiliated by Russian President Vladimir Putin who is defying the US effort to end the war in Ukraine. Russian media is now portraying Trump as the tough talker who always blinks and never imposes consequences. The president also thought that he could shape China to his will by facing down leader Xi Jinping in a trade war. But he misunderstood Chinese politics. The one thing an authoritarian in Beijing can never do is bow down to a US president. US officials say now they'refrustratedthat China hasn't followed through on commitments meant to deescalate the trade conflict. As with China, Trump backed down in his tariff war with the European Union. Then Financial Times commentator Robert Armstrong enraged the president by coining the termTACO trade— "Trump Always Chickens Out." Everyone thought that Trump would be on the same page as Benjamin Netanyahu. After all, in his first term he offered the Israeli prime minister pretty much everything he wanted. But now that he's trying to broker peace in the Middle East, Trump is finding thatprolonging the Gaza conflict is existential for Netanyahu's political career,much like Ukraine for Putin. And Trump's ambition for an Iranian nuclear deal is frustrating Israeli plans to use a moment of strategic weakness for the Islamic Republic to try to take out its reactors militarily. Powerful leaders are pursuing their own versions of the national interest that exist in a parallel reality and on different historical and actual timelines to shorter, more transactional, aspirations of American presidents. Most aren't susceptible to personal appeals with no payback. And after Trump's attempts to humiliate Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office, the lure of the White House is waning. Trump spent months on the campaign trail last year boasting that his "very good relationship" with Putin or Xi would magically solve deep geopolitical and economic problems between global powers that might be unsolvable. He's far from the first US leader to suffer from such delusions. President George W. Bush famously looked into the Kremlin tyrant's eyes and "got a sense of his soul." President Barack Obama disdained Russia as a decaying regional power and once dismissed Putin as the "bored kid in the back of the classroom." That didn't work out so well when the bored kid annexed Crimea. More broadly, the 21st century presidents have all acted as though they're men of destiny. Bush came to office determined not to act as the global policeman. But the September 11 attacks in 2001 made him exactly that. He started wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — which the US won, then lost the peace. And his failed second term goal to democratize the Arab world never went anywhere. Obama tried to make amends for the global war on terror and travelled to Egypt to tell Muslims it was time for "a new beginning." His early presidency pulsated with a sense that his charisma and unique background would in itself be a global elixir. Joe Biden traveled the globe telling everyone that "America is back" after ejecting Trump from the White House. But four years later, partly due to his own disastrous decision to run for a second term, America — or at least the internationalist post-World War II version – was gone again. And Trump was back. Trump's "America First" populism relies on the premise that the US has been ripped off for decades, never mind that its alliances and shaping of global capitalism made it the most powerful nation in the planet's history. Now playing at being a strongman who everyone must obey, he is busily squandering this legacy and shattering US soft power — ie. the power to persuade — with his belligerence. The first four months of the Trump presidency, with its tariff threats, warnings of US territorial expansion in Canada and Greenland and evisceration of global humanitarian aid programs show that the rest of the world gets a say in what happens too. So far, leaders in China, Russia, Israel, Europe and Canada appear to have calculated that Trump is not as powerful as he thinks he is, that there's no price for defying him or that their own internal politics make resistance mandatory. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Trump’s foreign policy frustrations are piling up

Trump's foreign policy frustrations are piling up Every president thinks they can change the world – and Donald Trump has an even greate...
David Hogg draws attacks from both sides as his star risesNew Foto - David Hogg draws attacks from both sides as his star rises

Democratic National Committee (DNC) Vice Chair David Hogg is seeing his political star rise — along with the number of attacks lobbed at him from both parties. Hogg has drawn ire and praise from Democrats for his move to get involved in the party's congressional primaries, part of what he says is an effort to bring about generational change. Republicans, meanwhile, have long sought to turn him into a foil. And now that the 25-year-old activist-turned-party-leader finds himself at the center of a feud among Democrats, the GOP sees a golden opportunity. "Someone brought up to me today that your average voter doesn't know who David Hogg is," said one national Republican operative. "What's your strategy? Why are you guys talking about him so much?" "It's the most obvious point to show the national media, which is the Hogg wing taking over the Democratic Party," the operative continued. Hogg has seen his profile steadily grow since he first burst onto the political scene following the 2018 school shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., when he was a senior. He quickly became one of the leading voices of the gun control movement and later co-founded March for Our Lives. In February, he was elected a vice chair of the DNC. And in April, he made waves when his group Leaders We Deservelaunched a $20 million initiativeaimed at primarying incumbent Democrats in safe House seats with the hope of electing a new generation of members. Hogg explicitly noted that the group would not target front-line members or members in competitive districts. So far, the group has only publicly endorsed one candidate, backing Illinois state Sen. Robert Peters (D) in the open seat race for the state's 2nd Congressional District. But Hogg's decision to engage in the primaries has drawn criticism. While many members of the party acknowledge that Democrats need to do a better job of paving the way for new voices and a cohort that's more responsive to the party's needs, others have criticized him for overseeing the effort while serving as a DNC leader. Now, the Gen Z firebrand is contending with the possibility of losing his DNC position altogether. Members of the organization's Rules and Bylaws Committee decided earlier this month that they would hold an electronic vote in June to determine whether they should redo the elections of the vice chair positions won by Hogg and Pennsylvania state Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta. The decision was made after one of the candidates who lost, Kalyn Free, challenged the way the election was conducted. Free's challenge is unrelated to Hogg's efforts to primary Democratic incumbents. Hogg has criticized the move, saying it's "impossible to ignore the broader context" in which it's being implemented — a nod to the criticism of his primary efforts. Other Democrats have pushed back on Hogg's claims, including Kenyatta. "David's first statement out of the gate was, here's the Democratic Party doing some maniacal thing to push me out because of what he's doing with his PAC," Kenyatta saidin an interview with MSNBCearlier in May. "David knows that that is not true." Inan interview with Fast Company, Hogg did not go into detail about his conversations with Kenyatta but said he sees their disagreement as a "strategic" one. Howard Chou, a DNC member from Colorado who voted for Kenyatta but not Hogg during the initial vice chair election, praised Hogg and his ascension within the party, saying that for Hogg "to rise to a level that he's gotten to is pretty impressive, to be honest." But Chou acknowledged Hogg's DNC vice chair tenure "can be seen as tumultuous" and said he disagreed with the idea of engaging in primaries as an official. "He's done some revolutionary things, but we should still hold to standards and rules of … what we're doing here … we're the governing body of the national Democratic Party," Chou said. DNC Chair Ken Martin, who has lauded Hogg as an "amazing young leader" and said he had "great respect" for him, hasalso told reportershe's against Hogg primarying members while holding the vice chair position. "No DNC officer should ever attempt to influence the outcome of a primary election," Martin said on a press call last month. Some Democrats are more conflicted. For Paul Eckerstrom, senior vice chair of the Arizona Democratic Party and a former DNC member, it's a question he has struggled with. "Whether a challenger in a primary is successful or not, I think it's probably a good thing even for the sitting congressperson to at least, you know, pay attention to their constituency, pay attention to certain issues and not get complacent," Eckerstrom said. "So I have a hard time criticizing David for doing what he's doing." At the same time, Eckerstrom added, "maybe Ken's got a point" about not primarying members while being a sitting DNC member. Hogg has defended his plans and says Democrats need to better meet the moment as the party looks to reset heading into 2026 and 2028. "We can't just hope that Donald Trump screws everything up so much that voters come begging back to us for any alternative." hetold Fast Company. "We don't want people to feel like they're just voting for the less bad of two options. What we're trying to do is light a fire under everybody's ass in our party. And frankly, if that makes you uncomfortable, maybe you should question whether or not you should run." Still, the drama surrounding Hogg and Free's efforts to challenge the election results are threatening to deepen divisions within the party as Democrats look to win back the House and possibly the Senate next year. Republicans, for their part, can't get enough of Hogg. The party has sought to paint Hogg as a liability for Democrats, tying him to every young, progressive Democrat primarying an incumbent. "If he wants to work to elect more Democrat crazies and encourage more wokeism and nonsense, I'd say fantastic," said Brian Seitchik, an Arizona Republican strategist and alum of President Trump's campaign. Democrats do not necessarily look at Hogg as a threat to their incumbents. While they argue Hogg has seen major success in the activist space in co-founding March for Our Lives, some Democrats note he is not the only influential player in the party and still has more experience to gain. "He's an unbelievably talented activist and advocate, and he certainly has the ear of many influential people and in the progressive movement he's an all-star," said one Democratic strategist. However, the strategist added that they did not understand how Hogg's group primarying other Democrats would be beneficial to the party. "He's leading an organization that is publicly calling for primaries against longstanding Democrats on the basis of are they good? Like let's define that," the strategist said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.

David Hogg draws attacks from both sides as his star rises

David Hogg draws attacks from both sides as his star rises Democratic National Committee (DNC) Vice Chair David Hogg is seeing his political...
Five reasons the New York Knicks lost the Eastern Conference finalsNew Foto - Five reasons the New York Knicks lost the Eastern Conference finals

TheNew York Knickswill have plenty of time to dissect whatwent wrong in the Eastern Conference finals. New York was trying to make its firstNBA Finalssince 1999, and, after being eliminated in consecutive years by theIndiana Pacers, the Knicks must be proactive and honest about changes they will need to make to break through. For one, the team relies so significantly on All-Star point guard Jalen Brunson that he's often tasked with saving New York. But that's just the beginning. OPINION:Small-market Pacers party down in big way with NBA Finals trip MORE:Pascal Siakam named Eastern Conference finals MVP after Pacers down Knicks Five reasons why the New York Knicks lost the Eastern Conference finals against the Indiana Pacers: Teams simply cannot gift games during the postseason, especially during the conference finals. Game 1, when the Knicks held a nine-point lead with 58.8 seconds left to play, was the epitome of a missed opportunity. The Knicks actually held a 17-point lead midway through the fourth quarter, but they became complacent and could not answer Indiana's pace. It was bad enough for the Knicks to drop the series opener at home, but it was even worse when they dropped Game 2 in the Garden to fall behind 0-2 headed to Indiana. From Game 1, it appeared that Knicks coach Tom Thibodeau's preference was to try to match Indiana's speed, rather than to grind games down. It would turn out to be misguided. The Knicks ranked 27th in the regular season in pace, generating 97.64 possessions per 48 minutes. Indiana ranked seventh (100.76). While the Knicks sometimes did have success against theDetroit PistonsandBoston Celticsin the earlier rounds when pushing tempo, New York would've been far better off slowing the game against the Pacers because this was exactly how Indiana wanted to play. The Knicks committed more turnovers than the Pacers in all but one of the games, and New York lost the turnover margin overall, 93-75. In itself, that's pretty bad, but it gets worse. Because of the speed with which the Pacers play, those turnovers turned into easy offense: the Pacers posted a crushing 140-61 advantage in points off turnovers throughout the series. The previous point feeds somewhat into this. But whether it was off of turnovers, missed shots or even out of inbounds passes on made attempts, New York did not sustain precise focus on spotting Pacers leaking out in transition. While physically demanding, Thibodeau could've done more to tweak strategy, insisting that players drop back to prevent fastbreak chances. The Pacers registered more fastbreak points than New York in every game this series. Frankly, that was always going to be the likely outcome; the margin is what was concerning. The Pacers scored 106 fastbreak points across the six games, while the Knicks put up just 48. It wasn't until Game 3 of the series, after the Knicks were already desperate and down 0-2, that Thibodeau tweaked the rotation to match up better with Indiana. Thibodeau has always been a coach set in his ways, and his reluctance to go with fresher legs — against a team that sprints up and down the floor — was baffling. This is magnified further because guards Delon Wright and Landry Shamet are known to be plus-defenders, something New York sorely needed earlier in the series when Indiana's guards were scoring at will. Thibodeau did receive some credit when he eventually extended his rotation; it came far too late. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:New York Knicks: Eastern Conference finals loss explained

Five reasons the New York Knicks lost the Eastern Conference finals

Five reasons the New York Knicks lost the Eastern Conference finals TheNew York Knickswill have plenty of time to dissect whatwent wrong in ...
PSG set a new benchmark in the Champions League, but can it stay at the top of European soccer?New Foto - PSG set a new benchmark in the Champions League, but can it stay at the top of European soccer?

MUNICH (AP) — Paris Saint-Germain's ascent to the top of European soccer is complete. Staying there is another matter entirely. Saturday'sChampions League triumphconfirmed what many observers had suspected for some time - that PSG's moment had finally come. Years of frustration in European club soccer's elite competition was blown away in one glorious and historic night in Munich. Not only did PSGend its long wait for the trophyit prized most of all but it produced a statement performance and set a new benchmark for what it is to win the Champions League title. The 5-0 rout of Inter Milan was officially the biggest winning margin of any final in the competition's 70-year history. And it could have been so much more emphatic had Bradley Barcola been clinical in front of goal, Khvicha Kvaratskhelia taken more than just one of his chances or Désiré Doué stayed on the field for longer than 67 minutes having scored two and set up another. Star striker Ousmane Dembele didn't even get a goal to his name. As impressive as PSG's victory was, it could have been even better. In other words, this is a team that is yet to reach its peak. Work in progress With an average age of 24.8 years old, PSG's starting lineup was packed with youth, which was in stark contrast to an Inter team with an average age of over 30. At 31, captain Marquinhos was PSG's only starter over 30, while Doué was one of three teenagers to play, along with substitutes Senny Mayulu and Warren Zaire-Emery. "We have a lot of young players - players who need to develop and I'm one of them," Doué said. "We are always going to strive to get better." Keeping young teams together is easier said than done when Europe's biggest clubs come calling. That should not be a concern for Qatar-backed PSG, which is one of the richest clubs in the world and in recent years has focused on picking up the best young talent - from France in particular. Ambition It seems there is little danger of PSG settling for just one Champions League title. "We are ambitious, we are going to continue to conquer the football world," a triumphant Luis Enrique said Saturday night after winning the trophy for the second time as a coach, 10 years after leading Barcelona to the trophy. He sounds like a man who has his sights set on building a new era of dominance and quickly turned to adding to the treble of trophies already won this season. Next up is the newly expanded Club World Cup. "I think it is an incredible competition. Maybe not now in its first edition, but it will become an incredibly important competition to win," he said of the tournament that kicks off in the United States this month. "We want to finish the season in style with the cherry on the cake." Luis Enrique The 55-year-old Luis Enrique has established himself as one of the finest coaches in the world after winning a second Champions League title. PSG has entrusted him to build a team in his image, rather than a selection of superstars and it has paid off. He has turned PSG into a Champions League winner while playing arguably the most exciting soccer in Europe, with Barcelona possibly the only team to rival it in the entertainment stakes. Yet while Barcelona was picked off by a wily Inter in the semifinals, the Italians were blown away by PSG. Liverpool, which ran away with the Premier League title this season, was eliminated in the round of 16, while Manchester City and Arsenal were beaten as well. Luis Enrique's brand of soccer has simply been too good for the rest in Europe, which is now playing catch up. Transfers It is difficult to see where PSG needs to add to a squad with so much depth, but its rise to the top has come on the back of spending billions on some of the world's best players. The era of Galactico signings is over for now, but the arrival of Kvaratskhelia from Napoli in January was evidence of president Nasser Al-Khelaifi's ongoing willingness to go big in the transfer market. The Georgian forward sparked a dramatic turnaround in PSG's form in Europe, which saw it go from near elimination at the league phase to Champions League winner. The rivals Manchester City might have thought its Champions League title in 2023 would spark a new era of success in Europe, but the opposite has been true and Pep Guardiola's team was eliminated in the playoffs this season. The Champions League is notoriously difficult to defend, with Real Madrid the only team to retain the trophy in the modern era, having won three in a row from 2016-18. The difficulty is largely due to the wide spread of talent among Europe's elite. PSG will come up against a Liverpool team that topped the league phase of this year's competition and is already making ambitious moves in the transfer market. Madrid with a new coach in Xabi Alonso and signings such as Trent Alexander-Arnold should be a contender again. So too Barcelona after falling short in the semifinal. City, meanwhile, is undergoing a rebuild of its own. PSG, however, will likely start next season as the team to beat, with a bright young squad that finally knows how to get over the line. ___ James Robson is athttps://twitter.com/jamesalanrobson ___ AP soccer:https://apnews.com/hub/soccer

PSG set a new benchmark in the Champions League, but can it stay at the top of European soccer?

PSG set a new benchmark in the Champions League, but can it stay at the top of European soccer? MUNICH (AP) — Paris Saint-Germain's asce...

 

ALEX JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com